History Blog
Le Corbusier
2013, Feb 4th

Contaminated nature and beyond

Ornament convicted no harm but is a framed victim by men.
What really make ornaments to be appreciated is not their appearance, but men perception which was implanted through history to appreciate them.

Life is not to be appreciated, hedonism has proved through history of authoritative hierarchy, on the other hand the tragic mistreatment of the underclass. Appreciation of beauty was created by men. What we need is not to erect the sense of new, cheaper, machine-made ornaments. As it has been evidenced in series of Mies Van Der Rohe's works, it is the loop of men sensuality. The 'new' architecture which rise against the bourgeois is  not contaminated, too contaminated. The revolution against the idea must be turbula rasa, to erase vicious loop of desire. 

Underly by the same motives, If the works of mies van der rohe were something those were resulted from the principle, then The works of Le Corbusier should be described as something that erect the principle.
The representation of materiality which indicate the principle was elaborated, well represented, and still it is ornament of modernism. If what was suggested by Le Corbusier is a revolution, the autonomy which men are are liberated and modernized. Perhaps, living the same principle by the different means wasn't it. It must not be contaminated.

By striping down the ornaments produces no new standards but occurrences of new style of ornaments. The classical ornaments was blossomed through the history of its ages, just like tattoos.

 'for one has learned how to love, as so learned how to hate, one have learned them all before they dug him a grave, story of life is told what of his fear and brave....'

This was extraction from the essay from friend of mine strongly explicit the reason, why should people be getting tattoos

The premises of the principle was pretty much of why practice of tattoo, as ornaments, should either be preserved or eliminated. If it is to be eliminated, It should not be overthrown by  the 'another' practice which based  on same concept, but rather the revolution of the new concept. Concept that people should not be self-sympathy, that people was nothing but a gracious visitor of life. The pointless meaning of dwellings that is not worth to recognize. To live is to survive as the  module  of  collective system. We are just modules.

Within the Corbusier's pursues, neither men shall sculpted no new ornaments, nor perceive those ornaments at all, and absolutely not even to have sediment of joys through seeing the result of labored society, Encyclopedia shall no longer contains the word of ornaments, thou Men can entirely overthrown all of its existence. The barbaric practice which has put men through history of mistreated shall perished. 


No comments:

Post a Comment