The result did follow the hypothesis but there are also parts that did not went as aspected. There are more people than I expect but still not as much as I hope it would be. People does get drawn into the game mood, they react to the game such as excitement when the opportunities come. Free roaming occur as expect, people come by watch the match while smoking then left, some stay and come sit closer to the television. Group of student come and enjoy, I was surprise by once they watch the match, all of their conversation turns to be about either football or the match itself. I found it quite successful since people did have a topic to interact with each other and gain new experience
Some of the comment were "wanting to watch live football"
"too much mosquito"
Sadly at the date and time the exhibition, there is one live match but it would be at 2:45am.
Post-production documentation is very poor... it should depict the qualities of the event and the different ways in which the space was used in a more thorough way, which perhaps a drawing could've done.
ReplyDeleteThe installation depended on fragile factors (schedule restrains mainly) that made it vulnerable to succeed. This should be carefully considered when choosing site, if you need to attract a crowd you need to act where that crowd is.
I think your project leaves you with an interesting program and a very rich mix of experiences that I hope you can respond to carefully with your design not only of space but also of program and, of course, experience.